Page 27 of 41
Re: 1987 10 meter mid cabin complete restoration.
Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2014 9:08 pm
by rickalan35
Hi Todd, I think there's room to enjoy both sides of that coin. I'd be willing to bet that each and every time you're out cruising, you'll be experiencing the pleasure of knowing that you've got your own creation rumbling along under your feet.
Re: 1987 10 meter mid cabin complete restoration.
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 10:17 pm
by yorklyn
Guess what i'm picking up tomorrow?!?!? i'll give you a hint, their really heavy and burn alot of fuel!
Re: 1987 10 meter mid cabin complete restoration.
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2014 9:34 pm
by yorklyn
Re: 1987 10 meter mid cabin complete restoration.
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2014 9:38 pm
by yorklyn
Re: 1987 10 meter mid cabin complete restoration.
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2014 10:32 pm
by gitchisum
Looks BEAUTIFUL!!
I'm worried you'll start waxing the bilge though

Re: 1987 10 meter mid cabin complete restoration.
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2014 11:08 pm
by yorklyn
LOL! I actually thought about putting another coat of bilge paint on before I drop the engines in. I think I need therapy!!!
Re: 1987 10 meter mid cabin complete restoration.
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2014 6:52 am
by prowlersfish
gitchisum wrote:Looks BEAUTIFUL!!
I'm worried you'll start waxing the bilge though

No need ,I bet he is clear coating the bilge .

Re: 1987 10 meter mid cabin complete restoration.
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2014 2:56 pm
by Bimmerbill
Awesome!
Re: 1987 10 meter mid cabin complete restoration.
Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 9:55 pm
by yorklyn
Re: 1987 10 meter mid cabin complete restoration.
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 7:30 am
by RWS
it is abundantly clear to me that this boat will be far, far better when she splashes than she was when splashed for the first time.
NO QUESTION ABOUT THIS FACT !
RWS
Re: 1987 10 meter mid cabin complete restoration.
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 7:31 am
by todd brinkerhoff
Hey Todd,
Let me premise this that I am a trojan guy, but I wanted to get your perspective. You've done an amazing job, and spent a tremendous amount of time and money on this project, and the boat will be better than new. My question is, why a Trojan and not a manufacturer that has more of a following like a Bertram or Viking? Again, I'm a Trojan guy, but I think we all know that we aren't going to get the draw of a Bert if we try to sell. I've watched 10.8 Expresses sit in yacht world for years.
You do have an amazing boat.
Re: 1987 10 meter mid cabin complete restoration.
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 8:12 am
by prowlersfish
todd brinkerhoff wrote:Hey Todd,
Let me premise this that I am a trojan guy, but I wanted to get your perspective. You've done an amazing job, and spent a tremendous amount of time and money on this project, and the boat will be better than new. My question is, why a Trojan and not a manufacturer that has more of a following like a Bertram or Viking? Again, I'm a Trojan guy, but I think we all know that we aren't going to get the draw of a Bert if we try to sell. I've watched 10.8 Expresses sit in yacht world for years.
You do have an amazing boat.
My take on it ( right or wrong )
Different boats/markets Viking has always been top of the line and you paid for it on day 1 . Trojan F boats were well built but they were mid level with good quality and fit and finish . Bertram were build tuff with a deep V hull the could take on heavy seas that would stop most others , very popular with the die hard fisherman . They gained the can't break it rep . Fit and finish on the Bertram's was at best like the Trojan F boats . The Internal line of boats while a better boat in may ways then the F boats targeted many markets and did not focus on the sport fish market as Bertram did .
Add to the fact Viking is still one of the best boats still built with factory support for even the early ones . Bertram also is still being built at high end level , so being still in business helps the value a lot I believe .
And how many Gas Bertrams and Vikings do you see on the market ?
With all that said most boats stay on the market for a long time .
Re: 1987 10 meter mid cabin complete restoration.
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 9:39 am
by todd brinkerhoff
I don't want to hijack this great thread. This commonly comes up when I research repowering with diesels. I often hear, "I can see it if you had a Viking, Bert, or Tiara, but not a Trojan." We've seen some incredible projects on this forum, including Natchamp, Todd, RWS, etc. Just wondering their thinking with spending the money on an International.
Re: 1987 10 meter mid cabin complete restoration.
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 10:35 am
by Big D
The thinking is that if you plan on selling after you restore, then you're looking at it as an investment because you expect a return. Rarely does it pay off when you try to sell it for what was put into it for many reasons unless you know what you're doing. However, not all restorations are done with an investment in mind. Some are strickly because its the boat they are most happy with for whatever the personal reasons and have no intentions on selling, so value at the end of it all is irrelevant. Value is simply what someone is willing to pay, if its not for sale, then it doesn't matter how much was put into it or what someone else's perceived value is. Now if you change your mind five years from now and decide to sell, then the whole excercize switches to an investment and you can't expect that a buyer will pay the dollar value of the restoration for many reasons, like age. No matter what you've put into it, it'll still be a 30 or 40 year old boat and that will affect a buyer's perceived value. And that applies to all brands including Berts and Vikings.
If there's emotions involved and she's your baby and want no other, then go for it no matter the brand. If it's an investment, be careful.
Re: 1987 10 meter mid cabin complete restoration.
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 11:39 am
by RWS
just off the top of my head....
reliability
safety
increased range AND better Cruising speeds
RELIABILITY
versatility
SAFETY
overall VALUE
I have upgraded all the mechanical systems in my vessel, including HVAC
given her beam and length, a fair comparison would be a 38' express - cost new? maybe 300K with NEW diesels - maybe 400 ? I really don't know.
I have a far better hull than a comparable Sea Ray and other than the soft goods, a NEW BOAT.
after 5 or 10 years my repower will fetch more and sell FASTER than a similar vessel with gas engines
Even if I repowered with new Crusaders, she would then still be a 10 year old repower - no different that any other similar boat.
the diesels are SAFE and I know that if the batteries, solenoids and starter are OK - she is going to start
She will always bring us home safe.
I could never have done a trip to the Keys with the 454's without a fuel stop ON THE WAY.
That fuel stop translates into a two day trip.
Add in the difference between cruising at 15 kts and 21 kts - well, we can do more in a day out on the water or on a weekend than we could before.
A trip to the keys would have involved 4 days of travel.
Now we leave at 6 am and we're there at 2 PM
Plus we could do it (if we had to) on just about ONE TANK OF FUEL - DOWN AND BACK.
Also, off road diesel delivered to my house or at the marina is far cheaper than gasoline.
all that said, RELIABILITY and SAFETY were the main factors.
my tired Crusaders had (at the time) 20 year old (leaking) heat exchangers, hoses, coolers transmissions and other bolt on gear, none of which was properly maintained by the P.O.
The engine mounts were shot - especially the out board wood block risers - the PO had one secured with fiberglass mat.
the cost to PROPERLY rebuild exceeded the cost of new Captains Choice fuel injected 8.1 liter Crusaders with new gear, however to do it properly, I needed larger raw water plumbing and a thicker shaft and probably different props.
At that point, the DIFFERENCE between the diesels and the new Crusaders became THE decision making point.
Plus in 2005 I was still able to buy NON-Electronic, mechanical diesels at a realistic price vs.the newest common rail high end stuff.
Plus I had already replaced my genny with a diesel, three years prior.
So its all about using the boat.
She gets more use with the diesels than she would with the gas.
Simply put - we can do more with her, more trips, more sunsets, more overnights more EVERYTHING than we could have otherwise.
plus I love that damned boat.
RWS