Chrysler 440 Carbs
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2015 4:38 pm
The engines on our F36 convertible were originally 400's, but the previous owner replaced them with 440's and later rebuilt them. While there are a number of issues that I am looking at, one that has my immediate attention is a heavy gas smell that appears after shutting down the engines. It is quite noticeable in the salon for a couple of hours after using the engines, to the point of being overwhelming. Needless to say, this is a real safety issue!
Looking back at the records I got with the boat, the PO bought carb rebuild kits every couple of years, and also mentioned to me that there was a possibility that the shaft bushings were wearing out. Given that knowledge, I am going to replace the carbs with new Edelbrock marine carbs.
My question is which ones to use. The 1410's are the obvious choice as they are 750 cfm and the ones usually recommended for big blocks. On the other hand, if I calculate the cfm from an equation using a volumetric efficiency of 85% (my best guess), they would appear to be higher flow than optimal.
cfm = (cid x rpm x ve) / 3,456 = (440 x 4,000 x 0.85) / 3,456 = 433 cfm
For a dual plane intake like the Edelbrock 440 Performer that the PO put on the engines, Edelbrock recommends 120-150% larger for best performance. As far as I know, I have stock heads and Osco manifolds and risers, none of which should improve volumetric efficiency as I understand it.
So, it looks like I need a 520-650 cfm carb. The Edelbrock 1409 is rated for 600 cfm, which might slightly reduce power at full throttle, but we mostly cruise at hull speed and sometimes at ~3,000 rpm, so I do not feel like that should be an issue. I don't know if this would improve our fuel efficiency, but that would be a nice side effect.
On other forums, such as marineengine.com, other folks have used the smaller carbs on 440's with success, but I hate getting info on the internet, especially from folks that may not be in the same situation or have a vested interest.
What do you guys think? Am I missing something in the way I am looking at this?
Looking back at the records I got with the boat, the PO bought carb rebuild kits every couple of years, and also mentioned to me that there was a possibility that the shaft bushings were wearing out. Given that knowledge, I am going to replace the carbs with new Edelbrock marine carbs.
My question is which ones to use. The 1410's are the obvious choice as they are 750 cfm and the ones usually recommended for big blocks. On the other hand, if I calculate the cfm from an equation using a volumetric efficiency of 85% (my best guess), they would appear to be higher flow than optimal.
cfm = (cid x rpm x ve) / 3,456 = (440 x 4,000 x 0.85) / 3,456 = 433 cfm
For a dual plane intake like the Edelbrock 440 Performer that the PO put on the engines, Edelbrock recommends 120-150% larger for best performance. As far as I know, I have stock heads and Osco manifolds and risers, none of which should improve volumetric efficiency as I understand it.
So, it looks like I need a 520-650 cfm carb. The Edelbrock 1409 is rated for 600 cfm, which might slightly reduce power at full throttle, but we mostly cruise at hull speed and sometimes at ~3,000 rpm, so I do not feel like that should be an issue. I don't know if this would improve our fuel efficiency, but that would be a nice side effect.
On other forums, such as marineengine.com, other folks have used the smaller carbs on 440's with success, but I hate getting info on the internet, especially from folks that may not be in the same situation or have a vested interest.
What do you guys think? Am I missing something in the way I am looking at this?